Urgent Vaccine Safety Alert: Expert Exposes Hidden Risks in COVID-19 Shots for Children university of guelph vaccine scientist speaks out
The Aftermath of Speaking Out: A Vaccinologist’s Journey
A Brief Radio Interview that Changed Everything
Two weeks ago, I participated in a five-minute radio interview that turned my life upside down. As a vaccinologist, my expertise lies in developing novel vaccines and publishing research on vaccine safety and efficacy. The host of the show asked me one critical question: could there be a link between COVID-19 vaccines and the reported cases of heart inflammation in young males?
I answered honestly, expressing my concerns based on extensive research and collaboration with experts. Little did I know, this brief moment would ignite a firestorm that would change my world forever.
The Backlash: Harassment and Slander
Within 24 hours of the interview, my professional and personal life began to unravel. A libelous website was launched using my domain name, a fake Twitter account was created to slander me, and I faced relentless attacks through email and social media. My workplace, which had always been a safe environment, became a source of harassment, with colleagues turning against me both online and in person.
Despite the support from my institution, the University of Guelph, the harassment has been overwhelming. Even a member of the Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Committee joined in, sharing confidential medical information about my parents—an egregious breach of ethics by a practicing physician.
The Science Behind the Concern
The core of my concern lies in the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, especially for children. Traditional vaccine technology assumes that when a vaccine is administered into the shoulder, it stays there, with immune cells picking up the antigen and initiating a response. However, emerging scientific literature, along with reports from Pfizer to regulatory agencies, has shown that this assumption does not hold true for the novel mRNA vaccines.
These vaccines, unlike traditional ones, spread throughout the body. Only 25% of the dose remains in the shoulder, with the rest dispersing into various organs. Moreover, the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in the vaccine formulation, designed to enhance distribution, might inadvertently dampen the immune response we aim to achieve.
What’s more alarming is that these findings are based on studies conducted in rats, not humans, and the actual vaccine formulation has not been properly evaluated in these studies. The lack of rigorous safety testing, particularly in the context of mass vaccination of healthy children, is deeply concerning.
A Call for Respectful Discourse
The backlash I’ve faced has been devastating, but it underscores a larger issue: the suppression of open scientific discussion. Canada is currently polarized, and this polarization is stifling meaningful dialogue. As scientists, physicians, and citizens, we must ask ourselves: do we want to live in a society where voices are silenced, and open debate is crushed?
I am not alone in my concerns. Hundreds of physicians and scientists share my views, yet many are too afraid to speak out, fearing for their careers and livelihoods. We must learn to respect one another’s perspectives, especially in matters as critical as public health.
Moving Forward: A Plea for Caution
As we continue to navigate the complexities of COVID-19, it is imperative that we proceed with caution, especially when it comes to vaccinating our children. We need to ensure that the safety of these vaccines is thoroughly evaluated before they are administered to millions of healthy young people.
In conclusion, I urge Canadians to embrace respectful discourse, to challenge assumptions, and to prioritize the safety and well-being of our children. We must remember that open, honest discussion is the cornerstone of a democratic society.
